Twelve Angry Men Essay -- Twelve Angry Men

dozen Angry manpower The jury in a trial is selected to examine certain facts and particularize truth tushd only upon the evidence presented to them in court. It is assumed that the jurors lead judge fairly and without any personal bias. In spite of this impudence people will be people and in some cases, logic and emotion will collide. An excellent example that shows precisely what Im talking about is in the movie Twelve Angry Men. Twelve men who initially are strangers to each other have the indispens adequate to(p)ness of a young boy resting in the palm of their hands. In the inception everyone is convinced he is guilty except one who has one sensible doubt in his mind. The single man on his own was able to convince each of them by using logic to examine the certification of each witness. After a few hours of reasoning the jurors were eventually win over allowing the facts to overcome their personal issues. During the arguments in the jury room the issues of race, age, companionable class, personal experience and stereo types are discussed a number of times. I presume it is because those are the personal issues that people have and sometimes that is what they base their judgment on. When you are in a jury you have the certificate of indebtedness of setting all of that aside. Through the reasoning of the not-guilty voters the guilty voters are easy realizing that despite their passed and personal reasons they have to take into consideration the more burning(prenominal) actual events that occurred. Part of the problem the jurors are...