Have People Become Overly Dependent on Technology? Essay

Because we, as a society, atomic number 18 embracing engineering science without fully take c atomic number 18ing the long-term ramifications of this decision. Were constantly seeking out short-term gains and improve handsts without re exclusivelyy taking into experimental condition the unharmed picture for coming(prenominal) generations. Computers are great, tire outt name me wrong. They are wonderful as fountainheadls that help umteen simplify their life, get more(prenominal) discipline, and in the end, hopefully contract better, more inform decisions. These better informed decisions hopefully lead to better lives (for pile) or better r eveningues and increased cabbage (for companies).But ready reck atomic number 53rs are non perpetually the right choice, even when they issue to provide a solution to an existing problem. As a tool, a computer is a useful aid. It has helped architects and engineers design and provide more reliable, interest structures and buildi ngs. It allows us to split atoms, and categorize benignant genomes. It brush off take pellet out of business intelligence and product demand curves. It even allows us to flip money in the form of bits and bytes or else of actual wall root word money changing hands. But as a foundation for an authoritative enconomic pillar in our agricultural, I suspect were pushing the windbag of sane entailing.There is no such subject as an unhackable computer system. There is no such thing as a 24/7/365 computer system (despite what some(prenominal)what companies claim). And until in that location is, putting all of your eggs into a computerized future seems a bit short-sighted to me. Imagine a author outage. You go to bed, the charitable we had upright a a few(prenominal) years agone on our hypotheticly modern power grid. The kind that isnt supposed to happen. The kind that brought an entire coast of our country grinding to a halt. Thats fine, you posit, those things are frea k occurrences, and happen once in awhile.Like the atomic number 20 blackouts of a few years ago. But as our thirst for power increases, and our infrastructure gives to keep pace with it (and it trulyly is nowhere near to holding pace with it it is doubtful the U. S. has enough reserve electricity supplies without tapping into our neighbors from the north during breaker point usage periods). forthwith, kind of of just going a few long time without power, imagine an entire society devoid of electricity. Could it happen? For a few years, sure. But for a few weeks or even longer Who dwells? The read/write head in my mind isnt if such a thing is possible, exactly simply when.Now, fifty years ago, architects and engineers could keep on working, since they use their drawing off boards and graph paper to create the structures that hold us up. The NYSE could go on running use groovy old-fashioned paper and pencil, just like they did then. Citizens could use cash instead of ch arge or debit entry cards to pay for goods and services. The point is, fifty years ago, I gauge society could considerably survive and overcome a lapse in electricity even for a long period of time. It was inconvenient, that the basics of daily life (and the basics of our economy didnt depend on electricity existence reliable and abundant. All of that has changed. I suspect some new architects wouldnt know how to design a 50-story building on paper (without aid of a CAD program), or a affect who had to diagnose a patient without the reliance on ordering 10 or 15 lab tests. Or a politician who couldnt rely on instant polling techniques. Or citizens who had to resort to reading their news, instead of outlooking in on TV. Or an important stock exchange non being able to function because generators were never meant to be used full-time, indefinitely.As a tool, I opine computers are the cats meow. But as this something more theyve locomote, this integrated component that so s ome(prenominal) muckle get to become helpless upon, I am sometimes a little worried or concerned. We believe we live in a largely stable world, with virtually endless supplies of natural resources. And further that belief isnt grounded in reality we live in a limited-resource world where, one day (perhaps in some of ours future), some of those resources may real well run out or lessen signifi brush offtly.So its a simple equation limited future natural resources means limited supplies of electricity, the stuff that powers our modern world. PS Yes, I know, I know, lets pin our hopes on solar or nuclear, because theyve sh feature so much promise to date Naturally, a lot shadower change during my lifetime, but weve all been waiting for a breakthrough in energy production for decades and none has come. Nuclear was the ultimately big one with commercial realization, and that was nonplused more than 50 years ago domain has had tools since the beginning of recorded history and that is all engineering.We are a savage that can solve problems by creating physical solutions and that is in part what makes us different than most animals, though non all. What is disconcerting is that we ca-ca so many dependencies on engineering and large systems that we can not reconstruct or re-create easily. Yes, we are becoming too dependent on technology. Most of us cant import correctly. why? appealingness checking software. We consider become lazy. Why? Transport facilities. applied science is not naughty in itself, but we, the hoi polloi of 21st century, are misusing it.We own became sedentary and as a result diseases which were unknown 200 years ago put one across now became commonplace. No, we are not as a species too dependent upon technology as it stands today. As we entertain created the tools which led to technology, we dumbfound also learned why it is they get out and are necessary our memories fail us, so we need a record to correct us or to learn from or rewrite what is upon a computer is not pen in stone, it may be changed. This is a fluid way of cerebration that was unknown to previous generations a ever changing evolution of opinion.It is above all a neutral tool to communicate with those of our own country in with others, we need this in a world with a population in ever increasing billions. commonwealth will eer be indispensable and wanted for face to face interaction, but where that is not possible technology preserves those ties and allows us to reach out for move on aide. Spelling and language are ever changing fields it is not unknown for the people of one country to speak many languages and equable be citizens born of that society yet not have a common tongue among them. Accents, even the words and slang can and will change within less then a generation.Technology is allowing us to keep up with those changes, understand them, and also creating new ones also we know of disasters soon after they happen, if not as they happen saving lives of people just like us who while they might not have our culture or language, are none the less human. While there are new diseases, ask yourself if they are truly new or something that past generations struggled to survive against and communicate to rid ourselves and others of and failed, because they did not have the technology we are developing now to understand how a disease deeds and how to rid ourselves. Definitely another reason for it is that people are using it to presuppose forged things so that they dont have to say it to the persons face, like cyber-bullying for example. Yes mostly, but still there are those who have very minor traces of technology dependency.Despite we can retain of the people in urban areas where technology is the life blood of very living entity, some corner of the country the rural/remote areas, on the other hand, have no or very slight technology ran lives. They still live in a primitively where there are no com puters, electric cellphones, etc. and where they work with bare hands and bare feet. Technology is now rising, making our lives lot more wanton, but what about the idler the world? Yes The one day our educate power went out we could barely do any work because our Smartboard went out with the power. I mean even right now we are on the computer looking for answers instead of figuring out ourselves. So what happens when we run out of coal and anele and all this stuff no more technology We will have to do without it. Some people will do perfectly well without it. Others will search until death to rein another resource.Sadly the people who search until death will have just wasted their whole life on something impossible. Possibly if someone does it wont last long. Its only one resource. If someone plans that I hearby advise against it Now get off the computer and do something without technology First thing is it electrical technology youre on about, or technology in general? We us e general technology 24/7. We use products of that technology 24/7. We also use electrical tech 24/7. We have become dependant on it, yes. It has made us dumb, lazy, it has changed us a lot.But from a simple power cut, like with the thing above, that kind of thing should not happen. That is over-dependance even by modern standards, in all probability. We have integrated all kinds of technology into every second of lives. But its not bad. Its just the way some use it thats bad. beginnert know how to spell because of spell-checking? Too bad, mate, thats your fault. Should learn to spell without it. I can spell without it. I can spell really well without it. Why cant you? (Not to say YOU cant spell but who knows? ) The main problem from it, though, is probably laziness.Why passing when you can hop in the car? Why tender football, or rugby, or badminton outside when you can play Red Dead Redemption, or watch the Undead Nightmare story on Youtube? But I play outside. And get plenty o f time to play PS3 and watch stuff on Youtube. And type stuff up on Wikianswers while I should be doing my maths (eek ). Why set up that whole Geography paper from scratch when you can copy-paste from the net? I can. I get information from the net, but I do the paper myself. Why cant you? Its not the technology thats bad, its the way its used.God knows how many times Ive said that now. People instantly are fat and lazy. Boys do not know to swing an chop or harness a team of horses. Girls cannot carry two buckets of water supply or wash clothes without a washer. Women do not know how to spin thread or weave cloth and they can not sew a fine seam without a sewing machine. People have forgotten how to cut wheat with a sickle and corn-picking has become a lost skill. Books were a lot prettier beforehand they started printing them. Doctors cant tell what is wrong with you without X-rays, CT scans or lab work.If men with shovels were used to build roads instead of heavy equipment, the re would be no shortage of jobs. I would say, yes. I mean, people are always texting, on the computer, or watching TV to have real and in the flesh(predicate) conversations with people. Some people cant even survive without their cell phones or their iPods/laptops, which is kind of sad if you ask me. However, technology has helped us understand life better, connect with people you havent talked to in years, find cures and vaccines for deadly diseases, and ultimately change the world.Its how you use technology dont overuse it and use it correctly. I think it is important that we have technology in our lives today or else there would be many more lives lost, and much information lost to us. As for the answer before mine not all of us are in the country with horses and hay Not all people are this dependent. Most people are fooled by thinking they need the newest and the best. Do you really think that you need a phone that can turn your lights of 100 miles out? Of course you dont Do y ou need one that lets you watch videos of people falling? NOI would say 70% of the human race IS too dependent, but the 30% of us that isnt is probably the smartest. I came across this Seymour Papert quote over the weekend, the best part of which is below. In context, Papert is speaking about effecting real change in the content of shallow mathematics, and he focuses particularly on the teaching of fractions One theory among educators about why we should teach fractions in school was that manipulating fractions was actually closer to what people needed back before there were calculators. So a lot of school math was useful once upon a time, but we now have calculators and so we dont need it.But people say that surely we dont want to be dependent on the calculator. To which I say, Look at this thing, these eyeglasses, that make a dramatic end to my life and the life of everybody who reads or looks at any tiny detail. formerly upon a time we would have been crippled, severely handic apped. Now weve got these and we dont need to go through all that suffering. So we are dependent on this little thing. Well, so what? There is nothing wrong with being dependent on a little thing that everybody can have lots of. It doesnt even cost much. So, that is no argument.People tramp the dependence on technology counter-argument against the use of technology in the mathematics classroom pretty frequently. But as Papert notes, is it really all that bad if educatees became dependent on a technology thats cheap and easy to come by? In fact, here in the US at least, arent most of us dependent on cheap and omnipresent technologies eyeglasses, running water, cars, kitchen appliances? (And some of those arent cheap ) We dont make students in culinary school learn how to cook over a campfire out of fear theyd become dependent on ovens.Why should we shy away from calculators? That threat of becoming dependent upon technology to do mathematics is only a real concern, for me at leas t, under one of two conditions. One is if the technology we use is expensive or other than hard to access for some learners. This can be a real problem. But math teachers can combat it by seeking technologies that are cheap or free and easy to access think cheap, functional, sturdy devices like the TI-30X instead of monstrosities like the TI NSpire. (Thats an order of order of magnitude difference in the price there, in case you missed it. Or, as much as I loveMATLAB, its pricey and if accessing it is an issue for students, think instead about open-source alternatives like Octave. The other condition is when our exposition of mathematics becomes so restricted that it includes only those tasks that can be easily farmed out to technology. When you remove all the human elements from mathematics modeling, problem solving, pattern-finding, create verbally expression, and so on and reduce the subject to nothing more than rote learning mechanics, of course technology poses an exist ential threat to the discipline.And deservedly so any(prenominal) discipline that can be replaced by software probably ought to be. distant more of an threat to students long-term success is the dependency they can develop upon people, especially teachers. If a student has trouble manipulating fractions without a calculator but can read a problem thoughtfully, model a duodecimal situation intelligently, and complete and validate her work independently, I eel pretty good about that students chances in the future. But if a student can ace all the test questions about fractions but cant do anything with a real-world problem without external prodding and verification from a teacher or other authority (Is this right? , Am I on the right track? , and so on), thats when theres real trouble, and its got nothing to do with technology. Whos talk of the town about that kind of dependency in school mathematics these days?