Rene Desacartes and David Hume Essay

Rene Descartes and David Hume were two great philosophers during the modern period. Many of their issues center on the existence of matinee idol. Humes writings on the existence of God argon different to Descartes. Descartes tries to prove Gods existence while Hume tries to show the imbecility of believing in God. However, twain philosophers fail to solve the issue beca map they both hold many arguments. The major issue between Descartes and Hume is their conflicting systems on how the issue should be approached. Rene Descartes was an Enlightenment philosopher.He was also a rationalist. This is the turn nigh of empiricism as this theory claims that roughly experience rout out be distinguishn a priori, self-employed personly of experience. This means that if God were to be proven then experience would non necessarily be pauperismed as some truth. The explanation of oneself is essential to Descartes thesis. That solely object relations debar God are delusions promoted by the coherence of experience (Weissman) that is, our everlasting unverifiable experience of the world could be false, although God is known to be true.Having headstrong that the empirical world and matter could be simply the creation of a devil, Descartes decides to follow his own consciousness, which is the only thing he could rely on. He is the type of person who only depends on himself and always thinks I am in situations. Descartes makes the unnecessary assumption that he is the carrier of his combined states. He states, It is so self-evident that it is I who doubt, who understand and who wish, that there is no need to add anything to explain it.This, as well as the truths of mathematics, is perceived distinctly and distinctly. Clear and distinct ideas are very much relied on in the Cartesian philosophy of caput for Descartes they are the necessary truths, grabbed by the intelligence. This central consciousness he claims equates to a person the divisible soundbox as an exte nded thing in lacuna and time is finite, distant to the infinite, non-physical, monadic soul. This distinction is the foundation of Cartesian ontological dualism.The mind and organic structure are separate materials, existing on their own. Descartes believed that he developed a method by breaking a problem down into parts, accepting ideas that couldnt be doubted and getting rid of one conclusion from another. Descartes came to the conclusion that the conception has a mathematically logical structure providing a unified body of knowledge. He believed that in order to deem knowledge, there must be a normal method for achieving the truth, or any experience peck not be a dependable source.David Hume was an empiricist which means that he believes all knowledge must capture from experience, as there is no connatural knowledge within the mind. If the existence of God were to be proved, it would require psyche to experience or suppose his existence from experience in some way, bec ause reason alone is inadequate to prove his existence. Humes position about knowledge is skepticism, which means he doesnt believe we have knowledge for certain things. He is heavily influenced by the two philosophers, Locke and Berkley.Hume is similar to Berkley plainly without the part of believing in God. He believes in the analysis of causation. For theoretical account you know your friend is in France when you receive a post notification from them in France. Humes explanations are more concerned with a still physical brain and a graphic order of mind the mind alone can tell us anything about the world. It contains an idea that truthful and complex ideas are formed by direct perception of objects or self-reflection. Humes change incorporates an explanation on Lockes ambiguous use of idea.He refers separately to perceptions of sensations and those of reflection. Simple ideas of Locke such as space and time became complex ideas for Hume. All perceptions are sub military post ures, capable of existence independent of the observer. Therefore we are perceptions, with a non-observable self. Furthermore since there can be no impression of self, the idea of identity is weak. It is important to know that in Humes plan in order for people to obtain knowledge of something they must experience it first.Descartes believed that everything known, depends on perception, but if perception doesnt have evidence not only from itself but also from the alfresco world than it will not be able to verify anything. fit in to Hume, perceptions, can be cut down to impressions and ideas. Axioms, were self evident principals which were so clear and distinct that they could not be doubted, and therefore accepted as certain contents of knowledge. Contrary to Descartes belief that effects must come from a cause, Hume believed that causes are senseless and uncertain.This contrasts sharply with Descartes proposal of primary and secondhand qualities. The primary qualities of objects are their geometric, indubitable measurements such as their consultation, mass and status in space. These are only indirectly perceived through the secondary qualities of appearance, such as colour and tangibility. Descartes seeks to avoid a merely representationalist stance and attempts to further justify a belief in an external globe beyond our mental field of perception, and show that it is dependent on God.This is nigh linked with Descartes equivocation of clear and distinct ideas they refer both to the mathematical axioms of geometry in a triangle there is a certain determinate nature or essence or form of it, immutable and eternal, which has not been feigned by me, nor does it depend on me and to empirical statements about extension in space in the Fifth Meditation he seeks to walk out something certain concerning material things