A Hardball Leadership Essay

Politics is a battlefield for great power. Throughout history, governance play an important role in shaping leaders and forming sizable states. Wars be so far conducted to be able to get the advantage of regime. still nowadays, to get ahead into politics warfare is not necessary it whole depends on how an individual handles it. It is more than just the leadership skills, the charisma and the pauperism to serve. It is the usage of the sm ruseest strategies to get acquainted with the who and to get the what.The end justifies the means. Machiavelli famously imprinted these oral communication in the institution of politics. For Machiavelli, politics is more than just a career, it is an art that should be mastered and should be maintained. For Chris Matthews, politics is a game that should be learned by playing according to a set of rules. both authors remove goals in mind to be on abstract of the power. Their working serve as guidelines on handling politics. Machiavelli an d Matthews provide strategies on how to be an influential and effective governmental figure. These rules were patterned in the context of their legitimate society.Though Machiavellis attack on The Prince is more aggressive than Matthews, this is full generally because of the semi policy-making turmoil that has occurred during his time. Matthews on the former(a) hand, wrote practical go ones that dissolve be employ not just in government but as well as in business, job promotion or other aspects of life. This is to convey that politics is everywhere. N onetheless, despite the differences between Matthews and Machiavelli, their works are cohesively account to the path of power. To be the best player in the field of politics, one must maximize everything including flaws and opponents to his or her advantage.While Machiavelli foc utilise more on state affairs, Matthews applied strategies not just to politics but to general ways of life. Like Machiavelli, Matthews related in his book on how to grind away to power and maintaining it the moment it is achieved. The spread of influence and the utilization of wits depart be able to bring someone to the top. Matthews enumerated his practical strategies that batch inside the Washington circle used. The ability to appear puissant is one of the manoeuvre which Machiavelli has also cited. The embodiment of power is important to acquire power itself.From the famous saying of what the mind conceive the body result achieve, people and competitors will believe a person portraying as a powerful individual. It creates a strong impression. To convince others that one has a power it should chew over the outer attributes and incorporate the attitudes of a powerful entity. The Politician will have to utilize everything to be able to reach the top and at the top, his resources should be exhausted even more to maintain his or her stature. The Prince has the same aim. Machiavelli describe most of his tactics with the l ikes of being a fox and to be a lion at the same time.On the other hand, Matthews associated it with a confines of aggressive sports. In the field of sports, an athlete needs to play knotty and it is necessary to lay out the strategies to be able to win the game. The aspects of in nookytation and manipulation clearly reflect a Machiavellian theme situated in the White House. The politician works closely with the enemies rather than dodging them away. It gives the politician an opportunity to watch the actions of the enemy directly. Their capabilities sewer be used in favor of the politicians gain. Both authors have express the importance of alliances to strengthen influence and gain trust.Machiavelli stressed the importance of pickings sides rather than going neutral. Win or lose, the Prince still has allies to encourage him when crisis comes. Matthews mentioned having alliances to gain loyal supporters. He was able to portray in Washington, that people who actually do favor s for the politician become great allies. The work of Chris Matthews is much compared with Machiavelli. Both of them preached the same aim of acquiring power, though their subjects are contrastive. It can be viewed that Machiavellis The Prince is solely based on an individualistic start since he focused on monarchies as a source of power.On the contrary, Matthews approach is more inter-personal. By the title of his book Hardball How Politics Is play Told By One Who Knows The Game, it gives the impression of sports which is composed of individuals and teams. To be on top means to be the captain of the game. Hardball can be a recyclable reference for people who want to get ahead with life. As mentioned earlier, Matthews approach is not as aggressive as Machiavelli. This can be applied in other aspects of life because as what Matthews mentioned in his introduction, there are enduring human truths in the rules that politicians play by (Matthews 17).Matthews depicts politics as an ex citing and thrilling environment where the most amusing personalities are turbulently involved. Machiavelli, on the other hand, gave a cruel and ruthless picture. Since politics is compared with sports, the major player from Matthews book is a prominent figure in world politics. The United States is one of the most influential countries, economic-wise and political wise. As a state, the U. S. is good at keeping their alliances. The long years of friendship with other countries (i. e.Great Britain) contributed to numerous gains which helped the US to be a super power in the international community. Behind its status is the most powerful political figure in the United States. For the upcoming 2008 US Presidential election, it is famed to mention a candidate that created a name for him as the eldest colored American to be nominated for presidency. Barack Obama can be a perfect example of a major player in Matthews political field. Being raised in a multi-racial background, this bec ame an asset for him to reach different minorities in the country.This particular asset of Obama became one of his forefronts of his campaign which focused on thriving for change. Modern United States is a diverse country make up of various racial origins and Obama thought that his colored skin can be an advantage. Obama revealed in his memoir Dreams from my Father about his previous modus vivendi of smoking and drinking. Relating this particular detail of his life, it can be seen as a target for his opponent to dwell on. However, this can also be viewed as a method derived from Matthews book. Before the other party can even use it against him, he does the broadcasting himself.Admitting ones flaw can lessen the negative impact of it, and the rivals will have to search for a new attack to use against the politician. Citing this example, it is seen how Chris Matthews strategies are put to use. This kind of political play inside the White House reflects how the United States moves in t he reach of world politics. Taking that into account, Chris Matthews gives the readers a clear picture of the inner whole caboodle of Americas political center. Washington is portrayed as the battlefield, wherein politics is the game, and the athletes are the politicians who play hardball.