Art Industry Issue Essay

graffiti originated in New York in the belated 1970s. It st dodgeed off with locals writing their names on w all in alls and subway train on the dot for fame. Before and after that though there were other types of graffiti a good deal(prenominal) as political statements. Graffiti these days is mostly tagging which is the act of scratch a surface with a quick scrawl, stencils argon common in the city and large aerosol container pieces ar usually found on board train draw offs. The main stretch forth dealing with graffiti these days is how to preclude it. At the equivalent time there argon digressies that argue we ingest graffiti and it is an important direct of fine art.Most nation trying to retard graffiti are usually precisely against the art being produced il legally, that is on private property without permission of the owner. The main argument against graffiti is that it is primarily tagging and it has no brains behind it all. Nvirtuoso of it has any meaning. It is so called art that is unaccompanied for the hip-hop community. The tags make everything look disgusting because it is messy and unreadable. It gives the impression that the councils do non care. It costs around $200,000 a year to re give-up the ghost from beleaguers and everyday transport, this money could be better spent.Graffiti is a crime and attracts more than crime and gangs. Owners that perplex had their property vandilised by graffiti artists would want to move any(prenominal) where else. Graffiti on shop windows is bad business. There lose been a range of papers presented to support graffiti in a level-headed way and pr sluicet it from occurring contrabandly. Ideas already in practice are Designating blue tolerance zones in lanes in Melbourne CBD (Central Business District), such(prenominal) as Hosier Lane. The answer of high tolerance zones is to remark graffiti on the streets and not require it.Artists give be attracted to use the lane to exhibit their art kinda of commercial and public buildings. ?Legal murals have been encouraged by councils. This aims keep people interested in the graffiti style of art nevertheless on a legal level. ?Exhibitions are held frequently at places such as Kent Street Cafes Early Space and the Meatmarket that cross-file graffiti related art work and art done by present and radiation patterner graffiti artist. Artwork on exhibition is scarce ever tagging, but other forms of graffiti such a stencils, stickers, posters and aerosol pieces.This is aiming to move graffiti art from a street level to a professional level that can be used in the art industry. Councils aim to remove fresh graffiti from public transport in spite of appearance 24 hours. This aims to lower vandals moral and send the message that what they do will not stay so there is no point in doing it. Debates on whether or not graffiti is an actual art and what to do to prevent arise in news bases. In articles such as Graffiti Crimes fr om The Age (Melbourne) magazine and Graffiti send off Ridiculous from the MX paper the writers have very aggressive and unfriendly tones.In Graffiti Plan Ridiculous the writer is actually attacking a writer of a previous letter that suggested everyone entering the CBD must show ID and proof of conduceress. The idea goes with out saying that is ridiculous. There was really no need to eat an attack just for suggesting it. This shows that tempers are wearing thin on the issue and it is creating a lot of hostility. The article A Display Of Culture by Renae Payne shows the contention of graffiti artists that consider the art as an important part of youth and hip-hop culture. All the artists are in favor of acquiring legal support from councils.PERSONAL OPINION ? James Borg I com gear upe that graffiti is an art, always has been and always will be. The same can be argued about Marcel Duchamps Urinal as it is not a tralatitious form of art and can be gain vigorn as an insult. If a ur inal or scribble on a wall can be art then any thing can be art. Something becomes art when it is taken out of context. In the case of graffiti, in all its forms, text and images that are made to be contained on paper and private places are put onto public surfaces. Just because I think graffiti is a form of art does not mean it is not ugly.I think some art in galleries can be very ugly, just because I dont like the look of it doesnt mean everyone does not like it. I have very high expectations of graffiti art. The side of graffiti art is crucial. The high-tolerance zones are a satisfactory idea because all the good art is concentrated in one spot, any one can add their own work to it and no one gets in trouble. Legal murals everywhere are the best because the graffiti does not have to be secluded to a small lane and it encourages more legal murals. Legal murals hardly get vandalised. bootleg graffiti in true areas definitely destroys the area in a lot of ways. If a wall gets cr owded with graffiti it will attract more graffiti, some times of much lower quality. Some times better artists will add their work. Either way the public do not want to see it. I can not say I would like or not. If it were just tags I wouldnt, depends on what it looks like. Fences that run parallel with train lines are constantly being graffitied. Artists want their work on these walls because people hundreds of people catch the train everyday and see their work.If these walls were legalised the amount of illegal graffiti would probably be reduced by more than half. There are a lot of already legal walls on the train line and most of the time artists ask the owner if their wall can be painted. This should be encouraged. I like the whole style of the graffiti pieces and the elements used. I am not concerned about trying to get illegal graffiti recognised as a professional art form in the industry. Graffiti was meant to be illegal, thats the whole point of it. Illegal work will never be appreciated totally by critics because there are too many negatives.Art works in galleries that are based on graffiti might look good but technically it is not graffiti. I will support it as long as it stays creative. I have pretty much grown out of liking graffiti anyway because it is all the same really. I realised that it does more harm than good and it has lost its meaning, even though it started off putting a name up for fame. stencil art is good but a lot of it lacks skill and originality. The only way illegal graffiti artists will get properly recognised is by doing legal work.