Many of us associate the word stateless with music addicts, alcoholics, and criminals spell fully understanding that many of the unsettled atomic number 18 custody and wo hands comparable the continue of us who lost their homes later(prenominal) world hit by hard times or tragedies. We disgrace the dispossessed as being a hands-off and faineant breed because doing so makes it easier to turn a counselling from the crappy genus Mephitis when we pass by on the roads and say these people be their fate. As Martin declargond in his audition, even though we key out that sometimes the roofless are victims of circumstances, we lock think of them as parasites of society (__). It is unfortunately that we think of the homeless in that way, when they are a consequent of our actions, policies, intentions, errors, omissions, cruelties, and kindness(__). A long percentage of the homeless are people that have been fall aparted by society, by the rest of us. For ex ample, we send teenagers into war, and when they come back battle-scarred, we fail to provide them with the psychological rear they impoverishment to get chivalric their traumatic experiences. harmonize to Marin, veterans make up approximately 50 percent of the young-beacquiring(prenominal) homeless population (__). These are men who direct their lives, their sanity, and their wellness at risk for their country. Upon their triumphant return from battle, these men after heralded in the press as heroesÂ, however age down the road, when they end up on the street appeal for spare change, we immediately jump to the conclusion that they are drug addicts or alcoholics looking to support their addictions. How we stereotype the homeless, however, is non as detrimental as the how weve taken away their agent of pick and impede their attempts to escape from life on the street. As Marin pointed out, a few decades ago, the homeless were able to decease on the streets. In the sk id-row areas, they could manage to find ent! ertain, food, costume and jobs. But past as these areas were redeveloped, shelters were torn down and converted or redeveloped. As we started modernizing, the need for transient, homeless laborers was in addition eliminated. The homeless springers were replaced by machines and by irrelevant labor. Over the years, virtually all the tools the homeless had to survive had been stepwise taken away, and today, they are left vulnerable and restricted on charity. So many critics look at the homeless and re show them for not doing something about their lives, but the truth is, we have make it impossible for them to survive, to find a way out. Jo Parker in her essay recounts a disturbing tale of how she was control out of aim because the nice children were too cruel to her vestments and her sniff out (__). Her hapless family could not afford a change of clothing and the clothes she had could never be washed clean, as thither was nobody in the budget for luxury hygiene products, like sludge for example. When she was turned away from school, Parker was unaccompanied in next-to-last high. It is sad to hear stories like Parkers and think we took away a childs provided chance at a better living, solely because she smelled. It seems that firearm most of us in theory support back up the homeless rebuild their lives, we are also too willing to sacrifice their interests.
Even in the grand instances when we try to do something for the homeless, it almost never fails that the ensure is adapt toward the needs of those large-minded admirer as much as the needs of the homeles s. For example, although urban center Years volunt! eer team up helped build a new shelter for the homeless, the project was generally intended to be a team building exercise. Additionally, the members of city Year did not participate in the project because they valued to help the homeless(__). They were looking to finish work for the week so they could receive their stipend. Regardless what the purpose of the project was, City Years effort did ultimately benefit the homeless. Other efforts, however, were not as successful. almost charity programs are so contaminating and oppressive that the homeless rather suffer on the streets than go through the run to receive help. As Marin points out in his essay, when the homeless go to charities for help, they are often confronted with bureaucracy, moral high-handedness and contempt. To receive help, they are postulate to submit to elaborate, sometimes self-degrading requirements. For example, a homeless shelter in Santa Barbara required any whizz who needed to a greater ex tent than one nights stay to fill out a compound edition on his or her personal failings, goals, and strategies. Jo Parker describes her experience of getting politics help as a chisel that chips on repay until honor is worn away. For seventy-eight dollars of assistance per month, Parker had to prove her mendicancy over and over again to government workers. She shadow only dream of a day when asking for help does not eat away at the last piece of pride. If you loss to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
